Responding to Dobbs: The Price of Jewish Religious Freedom

Is claiming religious freedom the best way for Jews to respond to the recent Supreme Court decision?
Alexander Kaye, Meirav Jones, Isaac Weiner
Paul Becker/Creative Commons
Paul Becker/Creative Commons
Dr. Alexander Kaye is a former Fellow of the Kogod Research Center at the Shalom Hartman Institute of North America. He is the Karl, Harry, and Helen Stoll Assistant Professor of Israel Studies, and Assistant Professor in the Department of Near East and Judaic Studies at Brandeis University. He  received a Ph.D. in Jewish history from Columbia University, and a B.A. and M.Phil. from the University of Cambridge. He is ordained as a rabbi, having

Meirav Jones

Isaac Weiner

“A common Jewish response to Dobbs v. Jackson, the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade, has been the claim that abortion bans violate the religious freedom of Jews, whose religion sometimes mandates abortion. What makes this claim so alluring is that in recent years, the same Supreme Court that upheld abortion bans has been overwhelmingly sympathetic to religious freedom claims, leaning on the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) that allows religious exemptions from generally applicable laws. The group that has benefited most from this has been the Christian Right; the same group for whom the annulment of Roe v. Wade was a momentous victory.”

Read the complete essay in AJS Perspectives Fall 2022

You care about Israel, peoplehood, and vibrant, ethical Jewish communities. We do too.

Join our email list for more Hartman ideas

SEND BY EMAIL

The End of Policy Substance in Israel Politics