Josh Shapiro’s ‘Dual Loyalty’ Story Shows a Gap Between How American Jews See Themselves — and How They’re Seen

A classic antisemitic trope is not only about bigotry, but misconceptions that Jews need to address, writes a public policy expert.
Michael Koplow is a Senior Fellow of the Kogod Research Center at the Shalom Hartman Institute of North America and the Chief Policy Officer of the Israel Policy Forum. Before coming to Israel Policy Forum, he was the founding Program Director of the Israel Institute. He holds a Ph.D. in Government from Georgetown University, where he specialized in political development and ideology, and the politics of Middle Eastern states. He writes Israel Policy Forum’s weekly

“Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro’s revelation that he was asked by a member of Kamala Harris’s vice-presidential team vetting him whether he had ever been an Israeli agent has reopened a wound for many American Jews — one that never fully healed.

Harris ultimately chose Tim Walz over Shapiro amid an ugly campaign mounted by the far left that dubbed Shapiro “Genocide Josh,” despite his positions on Israel being nearly indistinguishable from Walz’s. That campaign highlighted how the far left had successfully turned any personal ties to Israel into a disqualifier.

More disquietingly, the anti-Shapiro campaign subjected American Jews to antisemitic accusations of dual loyalty. Nearly a quarter century after Joe Lieberman became the first Jewish candidate on a major party ticket, the anti-Shapiro campaign raised the specter of Jewish identity posing an insurmountable electoral hurdle…”

Read the full piece in the Jewish Telegraphic Agency

You care about Israel, peoplehood, and vibrant, ethical Jewish communities. We do too.

Join our email list for more Hartman ideas

SEND BY EMAIL

The End of Policy Substance in Israel Politics